Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Education

Slate vs OpenApply

Slate and OpenApply side by side for education: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 26, 2026

Higher scoreEducation CRM

Slate

7.9
Strongout of 10

Higher-ed enrollment CRM from Technolutions — applications, reader workflows, decisions, events, portals, and student success under one comprehensive license with public application-volume tiers.

From $30,000/year (Admissions, <1,500 applications); most clients ~$50,000/year

Education CRM

OpenApply

6.4
Fairout of 10

School admissions CRM — enquiry to enrolment, parent experience, re-enrolment, events, and finance integrations — lighter than a full SIS, stronger than a generic sales board.

Contact for pricing

Criteria where Slate wins

4

Ties

1

Criteria where OpenApply wins

1

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses education weights: enrollment & admissions and tuition & billing weigh more.

CriterionSlateOpenApply
  • Enrollment & admissions1.4×

    9.2
    8.2
  • Tuition & billing1.1×

    6.5
    6.5
  • Retention & re-enrollment1.1×

    8.5
    7.5
  • Family outreach0.9×

    8.7
    4.0
  • Price and transparency0.8×

    7.5
    4.0
  • Learning curve0.8×

    6.0
    7.0
  • Overall score

    7.9

    6.4

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureSlateOpenApply
  • Enrollment pipelineYesYes
  • Online enrollment or admissionsYesYes
  • Tuition & collectionsYesYes
  • Retention & re-enrollmentYesYes
  • Native messagingYesNo
  • Family portal or appYesYes
  • SIS / academic opsNoNo
  • Native marketingYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.