Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Clinics

eClinicalWorks vs Tebra

eClinicalWorks and Tebra side by side for clinics: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 26, 2026

Medical software

eClinicalWorks

7.0
Fairout of 10

Large-scale cloud ambulatory EHR with patient self-scheduling, telehealth, secure messaging, value-based care tools, and RCM services — broad specialty coverage, quote-based pricing.

Contact for pricing

Higher scoreMedical software

Tebra

8.2
Strongout of 10

EHR+ platform from the Kareo and PatientPop merger — charting, e-prescribing, telehealth, claims, online scheduling, and practice marketing in one independent-practice suite.

From $49/provider/month (public range; bundles higher)

Criteria where eClinicalWorks wins

1

Ties

0

Criteria where Tebra wins

5

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses clinics weights: charting and care and insurance and billing weigh more.

CriterioneClinicalWorksTebra
  • Charting and care1.4×

    8.5
    8.6
  • Insurance and billing1.3×

    8.6
    8.5
  • Patient relationship1.1×

    8.0
    8.8
  • Messaging and confirmations1×

    5.0
    7.8
  • Price and transparency0.8×

    4.5
    7.5
  • Learning curve0.8×

    5.5
    7.5
  • Overall score

    7.0

    8.2

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureeClinicalWorksTebra
  • Electronic health recordYesYes
  • Online schedulingYesYes
  • E-prescriptionsYesYes
  • Insurance billingYesYes
  • Clinic billingYesYes
  • Native messagingNoYes
  • TelehealthYesYes
  • Patient acquisition & recallYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.