Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Clinics

Tebra vs HubSpot CRM

Tebra and HubSpot CRM side by side for clinics: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 26, 2026

Higher scoreMedical software

Tebra

8.2
Strongout of 10

EHR+ platform from the Kareo and PatientPop merger — charting, e-prescribing, telehealth, claims, online scheduling, and practice marketing in one independent-practice suite.

From $49/provider/month (public range; bundles higher)

Generic platform

HubSpot CRM

4.6
Weakout of 10

Mature general-purpose CRM with a permanent free tier. Excellent pipeline and marketing — zero native EHR, e-prescribing, or insurance claims.

Free plan (permanent); paid seats from Starter

Criteria where Tebra wins

4

Ties

0

Criteria where HubSpot CRM wins

2

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses clinics weights: charting and care and insurance and billing weigh more.

CriterionTebraHubSpot CRM
  • Charting and care1.4×

    8.6
    2.5
  • Insurance and billing1.3×

    8.5
    2.0
  • Patient relationship1.1×

    8.8
    5.5
  • Messaging and confirmations1×

    7.8
    3.5
  • Price and transparency0.8×

    7.5
    9.2
  • Learning curve0.8×

    7.5
    8.2
  • Overall score

    8.2

    4.6

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureTebraHubSpot CRM
  • Electronic health recordYesNo
  • Online schedulingYesNo
  • E-prescriptionsYesNo
  • Insurance billingYesNo
  • Clinic billingYesNo
  • Native messagingYesNo
  • TelehealthYesNo
  • Patient acquisition & recallYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.