Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Clinics

HubSpot CRM vs Tebra

HubSpot CRM and Tebra side by side for clinics: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 26, 2026

Generic platform

HubSpot CRM

4.6
Weakout of 10

Mature general-purpose CRM with a permanent free tier. Excellent pipeline and marketing — zero native EHR, e-prescribing, or insurance claims.

Free plan (permanent); paid seats from Starter

Higher scoreMedical software

Tebra

8.2
Strongout of 10

EHR+ platform from the Kareo and PatientPop merger — charting, e-prescribing, telehealth, claims, online scheduling, and practice marketing in one independent-practice suite.

From $49/provider/month (public range; bundles higher)

Criteria where HubSpot CRM wins

2

Ties

0

Criteria where Tebra wins

4

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses clinics weights: charting and care and insurance and billing weigh more.

CriterionHubSpot CRMTebra
  • Charting and care1.4×

    2.5
    8.6
  • Insurance and billing1.3×

    2.0
    8.5
  • Patient relationship1.1×

    5.5
    8.8
  • Messaging and confirmations1×

    3.5
    7.8
  • Price and transparency0.8×

    9.2
    7.5
  • Learning curve0.8×

    8.2
    7.5
  • Overall score

    4.6

    8.2

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureHubSpot CRMTebra
  • Electronic health recordNoYes
  • Online schedulingNoYes
  • E-prescriptionsNoYes
  • Insurance billingNoYes
  • Clinic billingNoYes
  • Native messagingNoYes
  • TelehealthNoYes
  • Patient acquisition & recallYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.