Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Insurance

HubSpot CRM vs Applied Epic

HubSpot CRM and Applied Epic side by side for insurance: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 30, 2026

Generic CRM

HubSpot CRM

4.4
Weakout of 10

Mature general-purpose CRM with a permanent free tier. Excellent pipeline and marketing — zero native policy book, carrier commissions, or comparative quoting.

Free plan (permanent); paid seats from Starter

Higher scoreInsurance software

Applied Epic

7.1
Fairout of 10

Widely used browser-native AMS for growth-minded independent agencies — policy lifecycle, embedded personal and commercial quoting, insurance accounting, sales automation, and renewals. Implementation is a project; public seat prices are not on the product page.

Contact for pricing

Criteria where HubSpot CRM wins

2

Ties

0

Criteria where Applied Epic wins

4

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses insurance weights: policies and book of business and commissions and carrier money weigh more.

CriterionHubSpot CRMApplied Epic
  • Policies and book of business1.4×

    2.4
    9.4
  • Commissions and carrier money1.2×

    1.8
    9.0
  • Renewals and retention1.1×

    4.5
    8.8
  • Native messaging0.9×

    3.5
    4.0
  • Price and transparency0.8×

    9.2
    3.5
  • Learning curve0.8×

    8.0
    5.0
  • Overall score

    4.4

    7.1

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureHubSpot CRMApplied Epic
  • Policy book of businessNoYes
  • Commissions & carrier moneyNoYes
  • Renewals & retentionNoYes
  • Multi-carrier quotingNoYes
  • Insurance complianceNoYes
  • Native messagingNoNo
  • Sales pipelineYesYes
  • Vendor mobile appYesNo

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.