Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Insurance

Applied Epic vs HawkSoft

Applied Epic and HawkSoft side by side for insurance: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 30, 2026

Insurance software

Applied Epic

7.1
Fairout of 10

Widely used browser-native AMS for growth-minded independent agencies — policy lifecycle, embedded personal and commercial quoting, insurance accounting, sales automation, and renewals. Implementation is a project; public seat prices are not on the product page.

Contact for pricing

Insurance software

HawkSoft

7.1
Fairout of 10

Family-owned P&C AMS with personal and commercial policy management, carrier download, commission processing, retention alerts, and E&O-minded documentation. Rating arrives via partner integrations. No public seat price; the sales agreement is framed as 30-day, not a long lock-in.

Contact for pricing

Criteria where Applied Epic wins

3

Ties

1

Criteria where HawkSoft wins

2

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses insurance weights: policies and book of business and commissions and carrier money weigh more.

CriterionApplied EpicHawkSoft
  • Policies and book of business1.4×

    9.4
    8.6
  • Commissions and carrier money1.2×

    9.0
    8.4
  • Renewals and retention1.1×

    8.8
    8.2
  • Native messaging0.9×

    4.0
    4.0
  • Price and transparency0.8×

    3.5
    4.4
  • Learning curve0.8×

    5.0
    7.4
  • Overall score

    7.1

    7.1

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureApplied EpicHawkSoft
  • Policy book of businessYesYes
  • Commissions & carrier moneyYesYes
  • Renewals & retentionYesYes
  • Multi-carrier quotingYesNo
  • Insurance complianceYesYes
  • Native messagingNoNo
  • Sales pipelineYesYes
  • Vendor mobile appNoNo

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.