Comparison · Solar energy

Solargraf vs Leap

Two paths for solar energy sales: an industry-built CRM versus an industry-built CRM.

Updated September 26, 2026

Solar CRM

Solargraf

7.0

Fairout of 10

Enphase-owned design, proposal, permitting, financing, and light CRM platform — public annual plans from Starter through Enterprise.

From $2,799/yr (Starter, 2 users / 240 projects)

Higher scoreSolar CRM

7.2

Fairout of 10

Contractor CRM and SalesPro stack — leads, estimates, production workflows, portals, Leap Pay, and in-app financing on higher sales tiers.

From $79/mo (Essential, 1 user); Team from $298/mo

Criteria where Solargraf wins

Ties

Criteria where Leap wins

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses solar energy weights: proposal generator and financing weigh more.

CriterionSolargrafLeap

Proposal generator1.5×
PV sizing, shading, production estimates, and a customer-ready proposal or PDF without a parallel spreadsheet.
8.5
6.6
Financing1.2×
Quote and, when it exists, pre-approve solar loans, leases, or PPAs without retyping the homeowner in another portal.
8.0
6.5
Post-sale and monitoring1×
Installed systems, service tickets, and a clean handoff from sales into install / O&M without an orphan spreadsheet.
6.2
7.8
Native messaging0.9×
Native SMS or messaging inbox on the lead card, with team history. WhatsApp Business API also counts. Marketplace apps, extensions, and website buttons do not.
3.0
7.6
Price and transparency0.8×
Public plan, currency, trial, and whether you can start without a vendor sales call.
7.2
7.6
Learning curve0.8×
English UI, solar vocabulary (kW, shade, PTO, TPO), and time to the first usable proposal.
8.0
7.4
Overall score
7.0
7.2

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureSolargrafLeap

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.