Comparison · WhatsApp
Pipedrive vs Kommo
Two paths for WhatsApp sales: a generic CRM versus an industry-built CRM.
Updated September 26, 2026
Pipedrive
Mature pipeline CRM with a Messaging app extension and marketplace WhatsApp connectors. Excellent deal board — WhatsApp is not a native first-party inbox on the lead, so inbox and official API stay false on this yardstick.
Paid plans in USD (14-day trial); WhatsApp via marketplace / Messaging app partners
Kommo
Sales CRM built around messengers — official WhatsApp Business Platform integration on all plans, shared inbox, templates, Flows, and pipelines. One of the clearest CRM-plus-WhatsApp stacks in the English market.
From $25/user/mo (Base); Advanced $35; Pro $45 — Meta fees separate
Criteria where Pipedrive wins
1
Ties
0
Criteria where Kommo wins
5
Score by criterion
In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.
Shared inbox & routing1.4×
3.29.0Official WhatsApp API1.3×
2.89.0Campaigns & templates1.1×
3.08.4Conversation CRM depth1.3×
3.49.1Price and transparency0.9×
6.48.0Learning curve0.8×
8.07.6Overall score
4.1
8.6
Native features
Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.
- In-product inboxNoYes
- Official APINoYes
- Sales pipelineYesYes
- Multi-agent inboxNoYes
- Native chatbotNoYes
- CampaignsNoYes
- Meta message templatesNoYes
- Vendor mobile appYesYes
Compare with another rival
Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.
Compare Pipedrive with