Comparison · WhatsApp
Pipedrive vs Trengo
Two paths for WhatsApp sales: a generic CRM versus an industry-built CRM.
Updated September 26, 2026
Pipedrive
Mature pipeline CRM with a Messaging app extension and marketplace WhatsApp connectors. Excellent deal board — WhatsApp is not a native first-party inbox on the lead, so inbox and official API stay false on this yardstick.
Paid plans in USD (14-day trial); WhatsApp via marketplace / Messaging app partners
Trengo
Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.
Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate
Criteria where Pipedrive wins
2
Ties
0
Criteria where Trengo wins
4
Score by criterion
In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.
Shared inbox & routing1.4×
3.28.4Official WhatsApp API1.3×
2.88.8Campaigns & templates1.1×
3.07.2Conversation CRM depth1.3×
3.48.0Price and transparency0.9×
6.44.8Learning curve0.8×
8.07.2Overall score
4.1
7.6
Native features
Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.
- In-product inboxNoYes
- Official APINoYes
- Sales pipelineYesNo
- Multi-agent inboxNoYes
- Native chatbotNoYes
- CampaignsNoYes
- Meta message templatesNoYes
- Vendor mobile appYesYes
Compare with another rival
Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.
Compare Pipedrive with