Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · WhatsApp

Pipedrive vs Trengo

Two paths for WhatsApp sales: a generic CRM versus an industry-built CRM.

Updated September 26, 2026

Generic CRM

Pipedrive

4.1
Weakout of 10

Mature pipeline CRM with a Messaging app extension and marketplace WhatsApp connectors. Excellent deal board — WhatsApp is not a native first-party inbox on the lead, so inbox and official API stay false on this yardstick.

Paid plans in USD (14-day trial); WhatsApp via marketplace / Messaging app partners

Higher scoreWhatsApp CRM

Trengo

7.6
Strongout of 10

Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.

Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate

Criteria where Pipedrive wins

2

Ties

0

Criteria where Trengo wins

4

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.

CriterionPipedriveTrengo
  • Shared inbox & routing1.4×

    3.2
    8.4
  • Official WhatsApp API1.3×

    2.8
    8.8
  • Campaigns & templates1.1×

    3.0
    7.2
  • Conversation CRM depth1.3×

    3.4
    8.0
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    6.4
    4.8
  • Learning curve0.8×

    8.0
    7.2
  • Overall score

    4.1

    7.6

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeaturePipedriveTrengo
  • In-product inboxNoYes
  • Official APINoYes
  • Sales pipelineYesNo
  • Multi-agent inboxNoYes
  • Native chatbotNoYes
  • CampaignsNoYes
  • Meta message templatesNoYes
  • Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.