Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Legal

Actionstep vs Clio

Actionstep and Clio side by side for legal: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 26, 2026

Legal software

Actionstep

6.8
Fairout of 10

Adaptable practice management with matter workflows, intake forms, documents, client portal, billing, and regional legal accounting options. Priced per user plus implementation — no universal public rate card on the pricing page.

Contact for pricing

Higher scoreLegal software

Clio

8.1
Strongout of 10

Category-leading legal practice management — matters, billing, client portal, court rules, and mobile app in Clio Manage. Intake CRM (Clio Grow) is a higher-tier include or add-on, not the base Manage SKU.

From $49/user/mo (US starter tier); UK from £69/user/mo billed annually

Criteria where Actionstep wins

1

Ties

0

Criteria where Clio wins

5

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses legal weights: matters and deadlines and fees and billing weigh more.

CriterionActionstepClio
  • Matters and deadlines1.4×

    8.7
    9.0
  • Fees and billing1.2×

    8.0
    8.6
  • Relationship and intake1.1×

    8.0
    7.4
  • Native messaging0.8×

    3.5
    7.8
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    4.2
    7.8
  • Learning curve0.8×

    6.0
    7.6
  • Overall score

    6.8

    8.1

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureActionstepClio
  • Matters & case trackingYesYes
  • Deadlines & docketsYesYes
  • Fees & billingYesYes
  • Documents & filingsYesYes
  • Client portalYesYes
  • Native messagingNoYes
  • Intake CRMYesNo
  • Vendor mobile appNoYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.