Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Legal

Clio vs HubSpot CRM

Clio and HubSpot CRM side by side for legal: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 26, 2026

Higher scoreLegal software

Clio

8.1
Strongout of 10

Category-leading legal practice management — matters, billing, client portal, court rules, and mobile app in Clio Manage. Intake CRM (Clio Grow) is a higher-tier include or add-on, not the base Manage SKU.

From $49/user/mo (US starter tier); UK from £69/user/mo billed annually

Generic CRM

HubSpot CRM

4.7
Weakout of 10

Mature general-purpose CRM with a permanent free tier. Excellent pipeline and marketing — zero native matters, court rules, trust accounting, or legal fee ledgers.

Free plan (permanent); paid seats from Starter

Criteria where Clio wins

4

Ties

0

Criteria where HubSpot CRM wins

2

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses legal weights: matters and deadlines and fees and billing weigh more.

CriterionClioHubSpot CRM
  • Matters and deadlines1.4×

    9.0
    2.5
  • Fees and billing1.2×

    8.6
    2.0
  • Relationship and intake1.1×

    7.4
    5.5
  • Native messaging0.8×

    7.8
    3.5
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    7.8
    9.2
  • Learning curve0.8×

    7.6
    8.0
  • Overall score

    8.1

    4.7

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureClioHubSpot CRM
  • Matters & case trackingYesNo
  • Deadlines & docketsYesNo
  • Fees & billingYesNo
  • Documents & filingsYesNo
  • Client portalYesNo
  • Native messagingYesNo
  • Intake CRMNoYes
  • Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.