Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Legal

Clio vs Pipedrive

Clio and Pipedrive side by side for legal: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 26, 2026

Higher scoreLegal software

Clio

8.1
Strongout of 10

Category-leading legal practice management — matters, billing, client portal, court rules, and mobile app in Clio Manage. Intake CRM (Clio Grow) is a higher-tier include or add-on, not the base Manage SKU.

From $49/user/mo (US starter tier); UK from £69/user/mo billed annually

Generic CRM

Pipedrive

4.1
Weakout of 10

Mature pipeline CRM with a large marketplace. No matters, court rules, trust accounting, or legal client portal — legal pieces arrive via third-party apps or a separate practice system.

Paid plans in USD (14-day trial)

Criteria where Clio wins

5

Ties

1

Criteria where Pipedrive wins

0

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses legal weights: matters and deadlines and fees and billing weigh more.

CriterionClioPipedrive
  • Matters and deadlines1.4×

    9.0
    2.4
  • Fees and billing1.2×

    8.6
    1.8
  • Relationship and intake1.1×

    7.4
    4.5
  • Native messaging0.8×

    7.8
    3.5
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    7.8
    6.4
  • Learning curve0.8×

    7.6
    7.6
  • Overall score

    8.1

    4.1

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureClioPipedrive
  • Matters & case trackingYesNo
  • Deadlines & docketsYesNo
  • Fees & billingYesNo
  • Documents & filingsYesNo
  • Client portalYesNo
  • Native messagingYesNo
  • Intake CRMNoYes
  • Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.