Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Legal

Pipedrive vs Filevine

Pipedrive and Filevine side by side for legal: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 26, 2026

Generic CRM

Pipedrive

4.1
Weakout of 10

Mature pipeline CRM with a large marketplace. No matters, court rules, trust accounting, or legal client portal — legal pieces arrive via third-party apps or a separate practice system.

Paid plans in USD (14-day trial)

Higher scoreLegal software

Filevine

7.3
Fairout of 10

Legal operating platform for complex caseloads — matter management, docs, court timeline tracking, billing, and LOIS AI. Leads & intake appear in the product suite; commercial packaging is custom (Matters, Intake, Signatures, AI modules).

Contact for pricing

Criteria where Pipedrive wins

2

Ties

0

Criteria where Filevine wins

4

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses legal weights: matters and deadlines and fees and billing weigh more.

CriterionPipedriveFilevine
  • Matters and deadlines1.4×

    2.4
    9.2
  • Fees and billing1.2×

    1.8
    7.6
  • Relationship and intake1.1×

    4.5
    8.0
  • Native messaging0.8×

    3.5
    8.0
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    6.4
    3.6
  • Learning curve0.8×

    7.6
    5.8
  • Overall score

    4.1

    7.3

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeaturePipedriveFilevine
  • Matters & case trackingNoYes
  • Deadlines & docketsNoYes
  • Fees & billingNoYes
  • Documents & filingsNoYes
  • Client portalNoYes
  • Native messagingNoYes
  • Intake CRMYesYes
  • Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.