Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Legal

Filevine vs Clio

Filevine and Clio side by side for legal: scores by criterion, native features, and pricing.

Updated September 26, 2026

Legal software

Filevine

7.3
Fairout of 10

Legal operating platform for complex caseloads — matter management, docs, court timeline tracking, billing, and LOIS AI. Leads & intake appear in the product suite; commercial packaging is custom (Matters, Intake, Signatures, AI modules).

Contact for pricing

Higher scoreLegal software

Clio

8.1
Strongout of 10

Category-leading legal practice management — matters, billing, client portal, court rules, and mobile app in Clio Manage. Intake CRM (Clio Grow) is a higher-tier include or add-on, not the base Manage SKU.

From $49/user/mo (US starter tier); UK from £69/user/mo billed annually

Criteria where Filevine wins

3

Ties

0

Criteria where Clio wins

3

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses legal weights: matters and deadlines and fees and billing weigh more.

CriterionFilevineClio
  • Matters and deadlines1.4×

    9.2
    9.0
  • Fees and billing1.2×

    7.6
    8.6
  • Relationship and intake1.1×

    8.0
    7.4
  • Native messaging0.8×

    8.0
    7.8
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    3.6
    7.8
  • Learning curve0.8×

    5.8
    7.6
  • Overall score

    7.3

    8.1

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureFilevineClio
  • Matters & case trackingYesYes
  • Deadlines & docketsYesYes
  • Fees & billingYesYes
  • Documents & filingsYesYes
  • Client portalYesYes
  • Native messagingYesYes
  • Intake CRMYesNo
  • Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.