Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · Solar energy

Pipedrive vs Solargraf

Two paths for solar energy sales: a generic CRM versus an industry-built CRM.

Updated September 26, 2026

Generic CRM

Pipedrive

4.3
Weakout of 10

Mature pipeline CRM with a large marketplace. No kW calculator, no solar lender OS, no plant monitoring — WhatsApp and proposals arrive via third-party apps.

Paid plans in USD (14-day trial)

Higher scoreSolar CRM

Solargraf

7.0
Fairout of 10

Enphase-owned design, proposal, permitting, financing, and light CRM platform — public annual plans from Starter through Enterprise.

From $2,799/yr (Starter, 2 users / 240 projects)

Criteria where Pipedrive wins

1

Ties

0

Criteria where Solargraf wins

5

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses solar energy weights: proposal generator and financing weigh more.

CriterionPipedriveSolargraf
  • Proposal generator1.5×

    3.2
    8.5
  • Financing1.2×

    2.0
    8.0
  • Post-sale and monitoring1×

    5.2
    6.2
  • Native messaging0.9×

    3.5
    3.0
  • Price and transparency0.8×

    6.4
    7.2
  • Learning curve0.8×

    7.6
    8.0
  • Overall score

    4.3

    7.0

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeaturePipedriveSolargraf
  • Proposal generatorNoYes
  • FinancingNoYes
  • Native messagingNoNo
  • MonitoringNoNo
  • Website simulatorNoNo
  • Project managementNoNo
  • Native marketingNoNo
  • Sales pipelineYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.