Comparison · Legal

Smokeball vs Filevine

Filevine wins for high-volume plaintiff workflows and custom litigation pipelines. Smokeball wins for document automation, AutoTime, and Microsoft-centric small-to-mid firms.

Updated September 26, 2026

Legal software

Smokeball

7.2

Fairout of 10

Practice management built around documents and automatic time — Bill → Boost → Grow → Prosper+ plans. Client portal and case management from Boost; lead/intake depth concentrates on Prosper+ or Intake add-ons. No public dollar rate card.

Contact for pricing

Read full profile Official site

Higher scoreLegal software

Filevine

7.3

Fairout of 10

Legal operating platform for complex caseloads — matter management, docs, court timeline tracking, billing, and LOIS AI. Leads & intake appear in the product suite; commercial packaging is custom (Matters, Intake, Signatures, AI modules).

Contact for pricing

Read full profile Official site

Criteria where Smokeball wins

Ties

Criteria where Filevine wins

Editorial verdict

How to choose between them

Filevine assumes caseload scale. Smokeball assumes Word, forms, and captured time are the bottleneck.

If you run high-volume litigation and need custom matter pipelines plus court timeline tracking, Filevine’s platform is the yardstick leader — accept custom packaging. If you are a document-heavy transactional or general practice that wants AutoTime and templates, Smokeball’s Grow/Prosper+ story fits better — still quote-only on price.

Both punish the price axis for opacity. Neither is the transparent small-firm default (that is MyCase/PracticePanther). The duel is litigation scale versus document-and-time practice.

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses legal weights: matters and deadlines and fees and billing weigh more.

CriterionSmokeballFilevine

Matters and deadlines1.4×
Matter intake, case status, and deadline or court-rules calendaring without a parallel spreadsheet.
8.8
9.2
Fees and billing1.2×
Time, invoices, trust or client accounting, and collections in the same system as the matter — not a parallel bookkeeping tool.
8.0
7.6
Relationship and intake1.1×
Client portal, post-engagement updates, and a native path from lead to hired matter — not only a “won” stage.
7.6
8.0
Native messaging0.8×
Native SMS or messaging inbox on the matter or contact card, with team history. WhatsApp Business API also counts. Portal-only chat and marketplace apps do not.
6.8
8.0
Price and transparency0.9×
Public plan in USD or GBP, trial, and what sits outside the monthly fee. Mandatory add-ons for day-to-day work lower the score.
4.2
3.6
Learning curve0.8×
English UI, matter and billing vocabulary, and time until a fee earner can work without a long implementation project.
6.8
5.8
Overall score
7.2
7.3

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureSmokeballFilevine

Matters & case trackingYesYes
Deadlines & docketsYesYes
Fees & billingYesYes
Documents & filingsYesYes
Client portalYesYes
Native messagingYesYes
Intake CRMYesYes
Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.