Comparison · WhatsApp
Salesforce vs Trengo
Two paths for WhatsApp sales: a generic CRM versus an industry-built CRM.
Updated September 26, 2026
Salesforce
WhatsApp on Salesforce Service Cloud via Digital Engagement / messaging — Omni-Channel routing, bots, and enterprise controls. Deepest enterprise stack; steepest admin and seat cost in this ranking.
Digital Engagement / Contact Center Digital from $75/user/mo (billed annually) on top of Service Cloud — Meta/message credits separate
Trengo
Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.
Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate
Criteria where Salesforce wins
4
Ties
0
Criteria where Trengo wins
2
Score by criterion
In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.
Shared inbox & routing1.4×
8.68.4Official WhatsApp API1.3×
9.08.8Campaigns & templates1.1×
8.07.2Conversation CRM depth1.3×
8.48.0Price and transparency0.9×
3.24.8Learning curve0.8×
4.07.2Overall score
7.3
7.6
Native features
Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.
- In-product inboxYesYes
- Official APIYesYes
- Sales pipelineYesNo
- Multi-agent inboxYesYes
- Native chatbotYesYes
- CampaignsYesYes
- Meta message templatesYesYes
- Vendor mobile appYesYes
Compare with another rival
Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.
Compare Salesforce with