Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · WhatsApp

Salesforce vs Trengo

Two paths for WhatsApp sales: a generic CRM versus an industry-built CRM.

Updated September 26, 2026

Generic CRM

Salesforce

7.3
Fairout of 10

WhatsApp on Salesforce Service Cloud via Digital Engagement / messaging — Omni-Channel routing, bots, and enterprise controls. Deepest enterprise stack; steepest admin and seat cost in this ranking.

Digital Engagement / Contact Center Digital from $75/user/mo (billed annually) on top of Service Cloud — Meta/message credits separate

Higher scoreWhatsApp CRM

Trengo

7.6
Strongout of 10

Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.

Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate

Criteria where Salesforce wins

4

Ties

0

Criteria where Trengo wins

2

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.

CriterionSalesforceTrengo
  • Shared inbox & routing1.4×

    8.6
    8.4
  • Official WhatsApp API1.3×

    9.0
    8.8
  • Campaigns & templates1.1×

    8.0
    7.2
  • Conversation CRM depth1.3×

    8.4
    8.0
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    3.2
    4.8
  • Learning curve0.8×

    4.0
    7.2
  • Overall score

    7.3

    7.6

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureSalesforceTrengo
  • In-product inboxYesYes
  • Official APIYesYes
  • Sales pipelineYesNo
  • Multi-agent inboxYesYes
  • Native chatbotYesYes
  • CampaignsYesYes
  • Meta message templatesYesYes
  • Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.