Comparison · WhatsApp
Trengo vs Salesforce
Two paths for WhatsApp sales: an industry-built CRM versus a generic CRM.
Updated September 26, 2026
Trengo
Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.
Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate
Salesforce
WhatsApp on Salesforce Service Cloud via Digital Engagement / messaging — Omni-Channel routing, bots, and enterprise controls. Deepest enterprise stack; steepest admin and seat cost in this ranking.
Digital Engagement / Contact Center Digital from $75/user/mo (billed annually) on top of Service Cloud — Meta/message credits separate
Criteria where Trengo wins
2
Ties
0
Criteria where Salesforce wins
4
Score by criterion
In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.
Shared inbox & routing1.4×
8.48.6Official WhatsApp API1.3×
8.89.0Campaigns & templates1.1×
7.28.0Conversation CRM depth1.3×
8.08.4Price and transparency0.9×
4.83.2Learning curve0.8×
7.24.0Overall score
7.6
7.3
Native features
Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.
- In-product inboxYesYes
- Official APIYesYes
- Sales pipelineNoYes
- Multi-agent inboxYesYes
- Native chatbotYesYes
- CampaignsYesYes
- Meta message templatesYesYes
- Vendor mobile appYesYes
Compare with another rival
Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.
Compare Trengo with