Comparison · WhatsApp
Trengo vs HubSpot
Two paths for WhatsApp sales: an industry-built CRM versus a generic CRM.
Updated September 26, 2026
Trengo
Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.
Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate
HubSpot
Native WhatsApp Business channel in HubSpot’s Conversations inbox — send/receive, workflows, and contact timeline logging. Requires Marketing Hub or Service Hub Professional or Enterprise; not on the free CRM.
WhatsApp on Marketing Hub or Service Hub Professional+ (Pro from ~$800–900/mo public cards); free CRM has no WhatsApp
Criteria where Trengo wins
4
Ties
0
Criteria where HubSpot wins
2
Score by criterion
In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.
Shared inbox & routing1.4×
8.47.8Official WhatsApp API1.3×
8.88.0Campaigns & templates1.1×
7.27.4Conversation CRM depth1.3×
8.07.6Price and transparency0.9×
4.84.2Learning curve0.8×
7.27.4Overall score
7.6
7.2
Native features
Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.
- In-product inboxYesYes
- Official APIYesYes
- Sales pipelineNoYes
- Multi-agent inboxYesYes
- Native chatbotYesYes
- CampaignsYesYes
- Meta message templatesYesYes
- Vendor mobile appYesYes
Compare with another rival
Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.
Compare Trengo with