Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · WhatsApp

Trengo vs Pipedrive

Two paths for WhatsApp sales: an industry-built CRM versus a generic CRM.

Updated September 26, 2026

Higher scoreWhatsApp CRM

Trengo

7.6
Strongout of 10

Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.

Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate

Generic CRM

Pipedrive

4.1
Weakout of 10

Mature pipeline CRM with a Messaging app extension and marketplace WhatsApp connectors. Excellent deal board — WhatsApp is not a native first-party inbox on the lead, so inbox and official API stay false on this yardstick.

Paid plans in USD (14-day trial); WhatsApp via marketplace / Messaging app partners

Criteria where Trengo wins

4

Ties

0

Criteria where Pipedrive wins

2

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.

CriterionTrengoPipedrive
  • Shared inbox & routing1.4×

    8.4
    3.2
  • Official WhatsApp API1.3×

    8.8
    2.8
  • Campaigns & templates1.1×

    7.2
    3.0
  • Conversation CRM depth1.3×

    8.0
    3.4
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    4.8
    6.4
  • Learning curve0.8×

    7.2
    8.0
  • Overall score

    7.6

    4.1

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureTrengoPipedrive
  • In-product inboxYesNo
  • Official APIYesNo
  • Sales pipelineNoYes
  • Multi-agent inboxYesNo
  • Native chatbotYesNo
  • CampaignsYesNo
  • Meta message templatesYesNo
  • Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.