Comparison · WhatsApp
Trengo vs Pipedrive
Two paths for WhatsApp sales: an industry-built CRM versus a generic CRM.
Updated September 26, 2026
Trengo
Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.
Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate
Pipedrive
Mature pipeline CRM with a Messaging app extension and marketplace WhatsApp connectors. Excellent deal board — WhatsApp is not a native first-party inbox on the lead, so inbox and official API stay false on this yardstick.
Paid plans in USD (14-day trial); WhatsApp via marketplace / Messaging app partners
Criteria where Trengo wins
4
Ties
0
Criteria where Pipedrive wins
2
Score by criterion
In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.
Shared inbox & routing1.4×
8.43.2Official WhatsApp API1.3×
8.82.8Campaigns & templates1.1×
7.23.0Conversation CRM depth1.3×
8.03.4Price and transparency0.9×
4.86.4Learning curve0.8×
7.28.0Overall score
7.6
4.1
Native features
Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.
- In-product inboxYesNo
- Official APIYesNo
- Sales pipelineNoYes
- Multi-agent inboxYesNo
- Native chatbotYesNo
- CampaignsYesNo
- Meta message templatesYesNo
- Vendor mobile appYesYes
Compare with another rival
Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.
Compare Trengo with