Comparison · WhatsApp
Trengo vs WATI
Two paths for WhatsApp sales: an industry-built CRM versus an industry-built CRM.
Updated September 26, 2026
Trengo
Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.
Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate
WATI
WhatsApp Business Platform toolkit — shared inbox, broadcasts, chatbots, Shopify-oriented commerce flows, and official API setup. Strong when WhatsApp is the channel; thinner as a full CRM of record.
Growth from ~$59/mo billed annually (~$69 month-to-month); message fees on WATI rate card
Criteria where Trengo wins
0
Ties
0
Criteria where WATI wins
6
Score by criterion
In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.
Shared inbox & routing1.4×
8.48.6Official WhatsApp API1.3×
8.89.0Campaigns & templates1.1×
7.29.0Conversation CRM depth1.3×
8.08.8Price and transparency0.9×
4.87.0Learning curve0.8×
7.27.8Overall score
7.6
8.5
Native features
Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.
- In-product inboxYesYes
- Official APIYesYes
- Sales pipelineNoYes
- Multi-agent inboxYesYes
- Native chatbotYesYes
- CampaignsYesYes
- Meta message templatesYesYes
- Vendor mobile appYesYes
Compare with another rival
Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.
Compare Trengo with