Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · WhatsApp

Trengo vs WATI

Two paths for WhatsApp sales: an industry-built CRM versus an industry-built CRM.

Updated September 26, 2026

WhatsApp CRM

Trengo

7.6
Strongout of 10

Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.

Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate

Higher scoreWhatsApp CRM

WATI

8.5
Strongout of 10

WhatsApp Business Platform toolkit — shared inbox, broadcasts, chatbots, Shopify-oriented commerce flows, and official API setup. Strong when WhatsApp is the channel; thinner as a full CRM of record.

Growth from ~$59/mo billed annually (~$69 month-to-month); message fees on WATI rate card

Criteria where Trengo wins

0

Ties

0

Criteria where WATI wins

6

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.

CriterionTrengoWATI
  • Shared inbox & routing1.4×

    8.4
    8.6
  • Official WhatsApp API1.3×

    8.8
    9.0
  • Campaigns & templates1.1×

    7.2
    9.0
  • Conversation CRM depth1.3×

    8.0
    8.8
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    4.8
    7.0
  • Learning curve0.8×

    7.2
    7.8
  • Overall score

    7.6

    8.5

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureTrengoWATI
  • In-product inboxYesYes
  • Official APIYesYes
  • Sales pipelineNoYes
  • Multi-agent inboxYesYes
  • Native chatbotYesYes
  • CampaignsYesYes
  • Meta message templatesYesYes
  • Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.