Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · WhatsApp

Trengo vs Zoho CRM

Two paths for WhatsApp sales: an industry-built CRM versus a generic CRM.

Updated September 26, 2026

Higher scoreWhatsApp CRM

Trengo

7.6
Strongout of 10

Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.

Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate

Generic CRM

Zoho CRM

7.5
Strongout of 10

Native WhatsApp Business messaging inside Zoho CRM (Setup → Channels → Business Messaging) on trial and paid editions. Credits cover Meta-side conversation charges; one of the most accessible native CRM+WhatsApp options for SMBs.

Paid editions from Standard (~$14/user/mo billed annually); WhatsApp via Business Messaging + credits — free edition is not the WhatsApp path

Criteria where Trengo wins

5

Ties

0

Criteria where Zoho CRM wins

1

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.

CriterionTrengoZoho CRM
  • Shared inbox & routing1.4×

    8.4
    7.4
  • Official WhatsApp API1.3×

    8.8
    8.2
  • Campaigns & templates1.1×

    7.2
    6.8
  • Conversation CRM depth1.3×

    8.0
    7.2
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    4.8
    8.2
  • Learning curve0.8×

    7.2
    6.8
  • Overall score

    7.6

    7.5

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureTrengoZoho CRM
  • In-product inboxYesYes
  • Official APIYesYes
  • Sales pipelineNoYes
  • Multi-agent inboxYesYes
  • Native chatbotYesYes
  • CampaignsYesYes
  • Meta message templatesYesYes
  • Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.