Comparison · WhatsApp
Zoho CRM vs Trengo
Two paths for WhatsApp sales: a generic CRM versus an industry-built CRM.
Updated September 26, 2026
Zoho CRM
Native WhatsApp Business messaging inside Zoho CRM (Setup → Channels → Business Messaging) on trial and paid editions. Credits cover Meta-side conversation charges; one of the most accessible native CRM+WhatsApp options for SMBs.
Paid editions from Standard (~$14/user/mo billed annually); WhatsApp via Business Messaging + credits — free edition is not the WhatsApp path
Trengo
Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.
Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate
Criteria where Zoho CRM wins
1
Ties
0
Criteria where Trengo wins
5
Score by criterion
In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.
Shared inbox & routing1.4×
7.48.4Official WhatsApp API1.3×
8.28.8Campaigns & templates1.1×
6.87.2Conversation CRM depth1.3×
7.28.0Price and transparency0.9×
8.24.8Learning curve0.8×
6.87.2Overall score
7.5
7.6
Native features
Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.
- In-product inboxYesYes
- Official APIYesYes
- Sales pipelineYesNo
- Multi-agent inboxYesYes
- Native chatbotYesYes
- CampaignsYesYes
- Meta message templatesYesYes
- Vendor mobile appYesYes
Compare with another rival
Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.
Compare Zoho CRM with