Comparison · WhatsApp
HubSpot vs Trengo
Two paths for WhatsApp sales: a generic CRM versus an industry-built CRM.
Updated September 26, 2026
HubSpot
Native WhatsApp Business channel in HubSpot’s Conversations inbox — send/receive, workflows, and contact timeline logging. Requires Marketing Hub or Service Hub Professional or Enterprise; not on the free CRM.
WhatsApp on Marketing Hub or Service Hub Professional+ (Pro from ~$800–900/mo public cards); free CRM has no WhatsApp
Trengo
Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.
Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate
Criteria where HubSpot wins
2
Ties
0
Criteria where Trengo wins
4
Score by criterion
In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.
Shared inbox & routing1.4×
7.88.4Official WhatsApp API1.3×
8.08.8Campaigns & templates1.1×
7.47.2Conversation CRM depth1.3×
7.68.0Price and transparency0.9×
4.24.8Learning curve0.8×
7.47.2Overall score
7.2
7.6
Native features
Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.
- In-product inboxYesYes
- Official APIYesYes
- Sales pipelineYesNo
- Multi-agent inboxYesYes
- Native chatbotYesYes
- CampaignsYesYes
- Meta message templatesYesYes
- Vendor mobile appYesYes
Compare with another rival
Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.
Compare HubSpot with