Skip to content
bestCRM

Comparison · WhatsApp

HubSpot vs Trengo

Two paths for WhatsApp sales: a generic CRM versus an industry-built CRM.

Updated September 26, 2026

Generic CRM

HubSpot

7.2
Fairout of 10

Native WhatsApp Business channel in HubSpot’s Conversations inbox — send/receive, workflows, and contact timeline logging. Requires Marketing Hub or Service Hub Professional or Enterprise; not on the free CRM.

WhatsApp on Marketing Hub or Service Hub Professional+ (Pro from ~$800–900/mo public cards); free CRM has no WhatsApp

Higher scoreWhatsApp CRM

Trengo

7.6
Strongout of 10

Omnichannel shared inbox with official WhatsApp Business API as a Meta partner — strong for support collaboration and AI helpdesk flows; less of a sales-pipeline CRM than Kommo.

Boost from €299/mo billed annually (€349 month-to-month); Pro from €499/mo — Meta fees separate

Criteria where HubSpot wins

2

Ties

0

Criteria where Trengo wins

4

Score by criterion

In green, who wins the criterion. The overall score uses WhatsApp weights: shared inbox & routing and official whatsapp api weigh more.

CriterionHubSpotTrengo
  • Shared inbox & routing1.4×

    7.8
    8.4
  • Official WhatsApp API1.3×

    8.0
    8.8
  • Campaigns & templates1.1×

    7.4
    7.2
  • Conversation CRM depth1.3×

    7.6
    8.0
  • Price and transparency0.9×

    4.2
    4.8
  • Learning curve0.8×

    7.4
    7.2
  • Overall score

    7.2

    7.6

Native features

Only what is part of the product counts. Marketplace integrations or third-party apps are out.

FeatureHubSpotTrengo
  • In-product inboxYesYes
  • Official APIYesYes
  • Sales pipelineYesNo
  • Multi-agent inboxYesYes
  • Native chatbotYesYes
  • CampaignsYesYes
  • Meta message templatesYesYes
  • Vendor mobile appYesYes

Compare with another rival

Each pair has its own page. The ranking only highlights the main duels — the rest are here and on each CRM profile.